|
Our ABC Response to
Client Concerns I have received several ABC client concerns on the
ABC North American Deep-Value Fund and its effect on the three other ABC
Funds. I would like to share a recent email: “I’ve been a loyal unitholder of the ABC
family of funds for Recently, however, with the launch of the NAD-V,
I’m My initial response to this question was one of
surprise. Quite frankly, it never occurred to me that I might slight one
fund over the other three ABC Funds. I regard myself as a professional,
but more importantly, I have too much to lose – my reputation, my own
invested money as the largest single individual client of ABC Funds, my
Chartered Financial Analyst designation (CFA), an industry code of ethics
and the fact that I have dedicated over 32 years to my profession and
almost 18 years building the ABC Funds.
Firstly, let me state that I am quite sensitive to
starting new funds in that I believe in quality of funds not
quantity. I have no intention of making ABC into a puppy-mill of
redundant funds. Rather, each fund or new fund must bring value-added to
our investment management and high performance process. I believe just as
the ABC American-Value Fund brought value-added to our ABC group with its
founding in 1996, I strongly feel that ABC North American Deep-Value Fund
will likewise bring many benefits to our existing funds.
The fact is that the ABC North American Deep-Value
Fund (NAD-V) has provided my team and I with a new focus i.e. to analyze
deeply undervalued micro-cap stocks as well as illiquid small cap/obscure
new financings. Normally, we would overlook these securities due to their
small size, absence of analytical coverage and lack of liquidity. In
effect, we concluded that there were excellent potential investment
opportunities which we ignored due to the open-ended structure and
risk-averse nature of our three existing ABC Funds.
In forming NAD-V we wanted a finite-sized,
closed-end (no monthly redemptions/no subscriptions) fund to take
advantage of these profitable anomalies. At the same time we positioned
NAD-V as a higher risk/higher reward, lower liquidity, specialty
investment fund. By extension, given that the NAD-V had a higher
risk/reward profile, its returns should logically surpass the three other
ABC Funds. Keep in mind, however, that risk is a double-edged sword and
that, at times, the NAD-V might underperform as well.
With the initiation of the NAD-V there are numerous
symbiotic benefits for our other ABC Funds. For instance, in analyzing new
attractive yet obscure investments the NAD-V serves as a prober or guinea
pig for our other funds. Sometimes we end up not only purchasing these
securities for the NAD-V but also for one or more of our three open ended
funds. Recent examples of such purchases include: Saxon Energy Services
(private placement), Atlas Cold Storage, Endev Energy, Royal Host REIT,
PulseData and John B. Sanfilippo. On the other hand examples of illiquid
yet deeply undervalued equities/fixed income securities deemed
appropriate only for the NAD-V include: First Nickel 11% April 27/2007
debentures, Arapahoe Energy, Rally Energy Corp, Skye Resources, Foodarama
Supermarkets, Merchants Group Inc., S & K Famous Brands and Avnel Gold
Mining Ltd (private placement).
As a final point, given that my family and I are the
largest individual unit holders of ABC Funds with over 80% of our invested
capital in the three open-ended funds it is in my best interest to see
that they all succeed. The fact is that these four funds are a large part
of my deep passion for my work and I would never compromise my principles.
I remain motivated and excited about ABC Funds and the prospects for
“deep-value investing”. This will not change.
Irwin A. Michael, CFA
|